Legal Opinion
Sherbrooke v. City of Pelican Rapids
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 17, 2008No. 06-4072PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.
David Sherbrooke filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the City of Pelican Rapids, Minnesota, and several of its police officers violated his constitutional rights. Specifically, Sher-brooke alleged that the officers violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment by stopping his car without probable cause and by recording one side of a conversation between Sherbrooke and his attorney. Sherbrooke also claimed that the officers committed several violations of state law, and alleged that the city was liable for maintaining an unconstitutional…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Riehm v. EngelkingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Smith v. Kansas City, Missouri Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Charles Mitchell v. Josh ShearrerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Alexys Sherry Parker v. Officer Adam ChardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Engleman v. Deputy MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.