Legal Opinion
Miller v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 1961No. Civ. 25588PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, J. pro tem. *
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the respondent court to vacate an order heretofore made in denial of a motion to quash service of summons and to require said respondent to grant said motion. The petition is verified by Harry Boyd, who deposes and says: “That he is one of the attorneys appearing on behalf of Petitioner Adrian Miller and as such he verifies the foregoing Petition For Alternative Writ of Mandamus on behalf of said Petitioner for the reason that he is more familiar with the facts stated therein than is said petitioner and that the whereabouts…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mundo v. FústerSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
- Melton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Sanford v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Olvera v. OlveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danny Lynn QUALLS, Defendants-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.