Legal Opinion
Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 23, 2011No. 2010-1502, 2010-1545PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Cordance Corporation (“Cordance”) filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) alleging that Amazon infringed, among others, U.S. Patent Nos. 5,862,325 (“the '325 Patent”), 6,088,717 (“the '717 Patent”), and 6,757,710 (“the '710 Patent”). The jury reached a verdict that Amazon infringes claims 1, 3, 5, 7, and 8 of the '710 Patent; that all the asserted claims of the '710 Patent are invalid; and that Amazon does not infringe any of the asserted claims of the other patents-in-suit. The district court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Mason Townsend, Luis E. Diaz, Orlando Nunez, Dorothy Taylor, Carlos Mejia, Joseph Angel Claudio, and Isabel MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Intouch Technologies, Inc. v. Vgo Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc v. Citrix Online, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Versata Software, Inc. v. Internet Brands, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012
- Carotek, Inc. v. Kobayashi Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Pratt v. PetelinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.