Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Petelin

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 19, 2013No. 11-3282PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Mrs. Jennifer Pratt sued Joseph Petelin, M.D. for medical negligence. The district court submitted four factual theories of negligence to the jury, which returned a general verdict against Dr. Petelin in the amount of $153,000. Dr. Petelin appeals, claiming three of the four factual contentions submitted to the jury were unsupported by sufficient evidence. We hold that Dr. Petelin waived this argument by not objecting to the general verdict form and requesting a special verdict.

I

Mrs. Pratt was diagnosed with papillary carcinoma, a type of thyroid cancer. Preoperative…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Melvin WALTHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. Advanced Recovery Sys. v. Am. Agencies, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Century Surety Co. v. Shayona Investment, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  5. Antero Resources Corp. v. South Jersey Resources GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API