Legal Opinion

Mary Pieczynski v. Katherine Duffy and Roberto Maldonado

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 7, 1989No. 88-2381PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

Mary Pieczynski, an employee of the City of Chicago, brought this civil rights suit (42 U.S.C. § 1983) against the City and three of her supervisors, charging political harassment in violation of the First Amendment, which has of course been held applicable to the states and their subdivisions. The jury exonerated the City and one of the supervisors, but found the other two supervisors, Duffy and Maldonado, liable, and awarded Pieczynski $95,000 in compensatory damages and $7,500 in punitive damages. Duffy and Maldonado appeal, represented by the City. The City argues…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Barton v. ClancyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  2. Massey, Michael v. Johnson, MableCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Lillian L. Mosely v. Board of Education of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Agosto-de-Feliciano v. Aponte-RoqueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Lohorn v. MichalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API