Legal Opinion

Moreland v. Durocher

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Snow, J. Case under the civil-damage act by Maria Moreland against Leon Durocher, a saloon-keeper, and his bondsmen, impleaded with Phineas E. Wiggins, another saloon-keeper, and his bondsmen. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action was brought upon the liquor bond of Leon Durocher and his sureties, John Schemm and Adam Hemmeter, with whom were joined Phineas E. Wiggins, Emich P. A. Solms, and Peter Bauer. The claim of the plaintiff is that her husband became intoxicated from drinking liquor obtained at the respective places of business of Durocher and Wiggins, and while he was intoxicated he whs run over by a train on the Michigan Central Railroad, and received injuries from which he very soon died. Both defendants Durocher and Wiggins offered testimony tending to prove that no drinks were furnished deceased…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Albright v. McTigheU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1892
  2. Powers v. IrishMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. People v. CrowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. O'Connor v. GiddayMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Mulcahy v. Argo Steel Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Pence v. BryantWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Broudy-Kantor Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  5. Kealoha v. Halawa Plantation, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API