O'Connor v. Gidday
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
This is an action of replevin to recover possession of a quantity of household goods claimed by the plaintiff.
The goods were those in use by the plaintiff in her boarding house, where she lived, in the city of Detroit.
The defendant Kloster obtained a judgment before a justice of the peace against the- husband of the plaintiff for about the sum of $255, had an execution issued thereon, and the defendant Gridday, who was a constable, by virtue of the execution, and under the direction of Kloster, levied the same upon said household goods, and entered the levy upon the execution as the goods of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hatch v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moreland v. DurocherMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Dayo v. ProvinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1892