People v. Crowley
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from superior court of Grand Eapids. (Burlingame, J.) Eespondent was convicted of failing to keep his saloon closed on Sunday. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.
The defendant is in business at No. 142 Grandville avenue, in the city of Grand Rapids. His saloon, grocery store, and dwelling are adjoining and connected. The store is between the saloon and the dwelling. He was convicted of the offense of keeping his saloon open and not closed on Sunday, the 14th day of December, 1890.
The evidence on the part of the people was confined to one person, a constable, who testified that he looked into the saloon twice on that day, — once at 4:30 p. m., and again at 7:30 p. m. When the officer was first there he saw the defendant go in behind the bar, and take…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Moreland v. DurocherMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. LundellMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. BinnardWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. TolmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. SchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.