Legal Opinion

State v. Northington

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1984PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PONES, Chief Justice.

We granted defendant’s Rule 11 application for permission to appeal to further review the issue of whether defendant made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel and whether in making such a determination it is permissible to consider the quality of a defendant’s pro se trial performance.

The Court of Criminal Appeals held that the trial judge’s investigation of the factors bearing upon a knowing and intelligent waiver were insufficient, and we agree. But, the intermediate Court, giving consideration to the performance of defendant at trial,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. State v. BurkhartTennessee Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. HerrodCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  5. State v. SmallTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API