State v. White
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
We granted review to determine whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in concluding that defense counsel’s dual roles as part-time assistant district attorney and defense counsel in this case created a conflict of interest requiring removal of counsel. The trial court found that defense counsel must be disqualified under the facts of this case because a “perceived” conflict of interest existed that could not be waived by the defendant. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed on the ground that an actual conflict of interest existed. After reviewing the record, we conclude that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Goad v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by248 opinions
- State v. BanksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Frazier v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State of Tennessee v. James HawkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Tennessee v. Tommy HolmesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Thompson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
243 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.