State v. Small
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRCH, J.
We granted permission to appeal in this case in order to determine whether an accused who has intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to counsel and chosen to proceed pro se is constitutionally entitled to the assistance of advisory counsel. 1 We conclude that there is no such constitutional entitlement and that the appointment of such advisory counsel is a matter entirely within the discretion of the trial court. Here, the trial court declined to appoint advisory counsel. For the reasons below stated, we find the trial court’s decision to be amply supported by the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. MelsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- State of Tennessee v. Howard Hawk WillisTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Tennessee v. Henry Lee JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.