Legal Opinion

Colclasure v. Washington County School District No. 48-J

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1992No. 88-15666; CA A67543; 89-05949; CA A67666PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

In the first of these consolidated petitions, claimant seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s reversal of a referee’s order reversing the decision of the Director of the Department of Insurance and Finance (Director) that claimant is not eligible for vocational assistance. In the second petition, claimant seeks reversal of the Board’s decision that he was not entitled to vocational assistance between the time that the referee found him eligible and the time that the Board reversed the referee. We affirm both orders.

The basis for the Director’s decision that claimant is not eligible…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Carr v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lasley v. Ontario RenderingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colclasure v. Washington County School District No. 48-JOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Harsh v. Harsco Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API