Harris v. Buckeye Irrigation Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the granting of a motion for summary judgment. Defendant had moved for dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., and the trial court treated the motion as a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules.
*499We must answer only one question on appeal: Does the previous case of Salladay v. Old Dominion Copper Mining Co., 12 Ariz. 124, 100 P. 441 (1909) and cases following, apply to the negligent construction and maintenance of a bridge over an irrigation canal by an irrigation company?
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Livingston v. Citizen's Utility, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Serna v. Statewide Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Downs v. Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Salladay v. Old Dominion Copper Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1909
- Lee v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
- Bledsoe v. GoodfarbArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Trujillo Ex Rel. Trujillo v. Brighton-North Point Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.