Legal Opinion

Lee v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1951No. 5403PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order granting appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and from the judgment entered thereon.

The facts are that Robert Jennings Lee, the minor son of appellant Alvira Lee, was injured by coming in contact with a high-voltage electric wire alleged to have been owned and maintained by appellee.

Two causes of action were instituted against the Salt' River Valley Water Users: one on behalf of the mother, Alvira Lee, for medical and hospital expenses incurred by her on behalf of her minor son, and the other by Robert Jennings Lee by his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Fusselman v. Yellowstone Valley Land & Irrigation Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Salladay v. Old Dominion Copper Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Hayko v. Colorado & Utah Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. MacNeil v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bledsoe v. GoodfarbArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hersey v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Harris v. Buckeye Irrigation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Clarke v. EdgingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API