Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. Bank of Washington
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentPaeKee, J.
Branch Banking and Trust Company, hereafter called Branch Bank, received the drafts from the Bank of Halifax originally as an agent for collection. As such it was not originally the real party in interest under G.S. 1-57, and nothing else appearing would not be entitled to maintain this action. Bank v. Rochamora, 193 N.C. 1, 136 S.E. 259; Worth v. Feed Company, 172 N.C. 335, 90 S.E. 295; Bank v. Exum, 163 N.C. 199, 79 S.E. 498.
The 6th finding of fact in part is: “The Bank of Halifax was given credit for the drafts upon their receipt by the Branch Bank.”
According to the agreement between…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Worth Co. v. International Sugar Feed No. 2 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Third National Bank of St. Louis v. ExumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- First National Bank of Columbus v. RochamoraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- American Barrel Co. v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.