Legal Opinion

Mershon v. O'neill

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 9, 1935No. 6616Published

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant in an action at law to recover damages for the alleged infringement of Letters Patent of the United States Nos. 1,141,402 and 1,784,-674 owned by the plaintiffs, for an order pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice of New York, to strike from the amended complaint paragraph 22 thereof; *283the paragraph is said to be redundant, irrelevant and prejudicial to the defendant.

Such a motion may be made in appropriate circumstances, as an incident to an action at law in the state courts.

At the threshold the plaintiffs object to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Mershon v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Celluloid Manuf'g Co. v. American Zylonite Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
  4. Fischer v. Automobile Supply Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API