Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Automobile Supply Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 29, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Law. Action by Charles Fischer against the Automobile Supply Manufacturing Company, Incorporated. On motions by defendant that the complaint be made more definite and certain and for an examination of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

The plaintiff has sued the defendant, alleging infringement of letters patent No. 969,660, granted September 6, 1910, and shown by the record upon this motion to have to do with a flexible metal tubing or shaft. Infringement is alleged in Brooklyn, at the regular place of business of the defendant, at No. 224 Taafe Place, both since the issuance of said letters patent and prior thereto, with intent to so infringe.

The defendant now makes a motion for a preliminary examination of the plaintiff, or for examination of a specimen of the flexible shaft*192ing which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Hanks Dental Assn. v. International Tooth Crown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Wilson v. New England Navigation Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Automobile Supply Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1912
  2. Mershon v. O'neillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API