Legal Opinion

Mershon v. O'Neill

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 17, 1934No. 456PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought in equity to recover for the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,141,402, issued to Ralph D. Mershon June 1,1915', for electrolytic apparatus employing filmed electrodes, and of patent No. 1,784,-674, issued to the same patentee December 9, 1930, and for an injunction. The Amrad Corporation, an exclusive licensee, was originally a party plaintiff and has since become Electro Formation, Inc., by a change of name. The defendant is an individual residing in the Eastern district of New York, where he conducts a radio service business under the name of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hutter v. De Q. Bottle Stopper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  2. In re TorchiaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Byers MacH. Co. v. Keystone Driller Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  4. Goshen Mfg. Co. v. Hubert A. Myers Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mershon v. Sprague Specialties Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
  2. Pennsylvania Research Corp. v. Lescarboura Spawn Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Mershon v. O'neillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935
  4. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Carpenter Printing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API