Legal Opinion

Smith v. Puritas Springs Park Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1937No. 16048PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MONTGOMERY, PJ.

The appellant brought an action in the Common Pleas Court against the two appellees for damages sustained by her while riding upon a certain amusement device known as the cyclone roller coaster. A verdict was directed on behalf of the defendant, The Puritas Springs Park Company, and while the appeal is against this order of dismissal, counsel for the appellant in open court announced that that phase of the appeal might be disregarded and the same is accordingly done.

The case proceeded to trial in the lower court against the defendant, The Cleveland Coaster Company.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  2. Maehlman v. Reuben Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Lausterer v. Dorney Park Coaster Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. McBride v. May Dept. Stores Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pierce v. Gooding Amusement Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API