Maehlman v. Reuben Realty Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS. J
Where one maintains a bathing beach in his own interest and in furtherance of such interest invites the public thereto, the duty rests on him to exercise ordinary care for the safety of his patrons in maintaining such bathing beach. In this respect a bathing beach is like any other place of amusement or recreation to which the public is invited.
Higgins vs. Agricultural Society, 100 Me., 565, 3 L. R. A., N. S., 1132, 62 Atl. 708; Decatur Amusement Park Co. vs. Porter, 137 Ill., App., 448, 452;
Greene vs. Seattle Athletic Club, 32 L. R. A., N. S., 713;
Turlington vs. Tampa Electric…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cincinnati Base Ball Club Co. v. EnoOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Larkin v. Saltair Beach Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
- Bass v. ReitdorfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Higgins v. Franklin County Agricultural SocietySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
- Boyce v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by10 opinions
- Park Circuit Realty Co. v. Ringo's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Beverley Beach Club, Inc. v. MarronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Nordgren v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Skelly v. Pleasure Beach Park CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Hecht v. Des Moines Playground & Recreation Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.