Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Gooding Amusement Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 17, 1949No. 4244PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HORNBECK, J.
The appeal is from a judgment on a directed verdict for the defendant at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case in chief.
The petition averred and the answer admitted that plaintiff, together with a young child, for both of whom tickets-*557had been purchased, went upon a merry-go-round operated by the defendant. It was further alleged that after the merry-go-round had started and when it was revolving at a high rate of speed the plaintiff was thrown off and injured. The averment of the petition was, “Plaintiff further says that all of the injuries which she sustained as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Birmingham Amusement Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Firszt v. Capitol Park Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Waddel's Administrator v. BrashearCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jones v. Wittenberg UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Hollywood Shop, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Martin v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Manker v. ShafferOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
- Corriveau v. DefenbaughOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.