Legal Opinion

State of Washington v. Daniel Blizzard

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 1, 2016No. 32866-0-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPennell, J.

¶ 1 Due process requires a fair trial in a fair tribunal. Daniel Blizzard argues he was denied this basic protection after his trial judge received a letter from the county prosecutor containing inflammatory accusations of judicial bias. According to Mr. Blizzard, the letter’s contents were so explosive they rendered the trial judge incapable of fairly presiding over the proceedings.

¶2 We are unpersuaded. The judiciary is not vulnerable to manipulation by politically charged criticism. In extreme cases, hurtful, personal attacks against a judge may make recusal unavoidable. This is not such a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Alan D. JenksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. In the Matter of the Marriage of: Angela K. Scoutten & Michael J.E. ScouttenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. In the Matter of the Sanction Order Against Robert CritchlowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. King County V. Aquatherm GmbhCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026
  5. Personal Restraint Petition Of Bradley David KnoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API