Legal Opinion

Powder River Ranch, Inc. v. Michelena

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 2005No. 04-83PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Powder River Ranch, Inc. (PRR) appeals from the district court's order granting Juaguin and Delores Michelena (Mi-chelenas) a prescriptive easement across its property. We agree with the district court's conclusion that the Michelenas fulfilled the difficult requirements for establishing a prescriptive easement in Wyoming, and, consequently, we affirm its decision.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] PRR articulates its issue on appeal as follows:

A. Did the district court err in finding a prescriptive easement in favor of the plaintiff?

1. Did the court err in finding sufficient proof of adverse…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harber v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. DexterWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Double Eagle Petroleum & Mining Corporation v. Questar Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. City of Gillette v. Hladky Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Yeager v. ForbesWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Whitney Holding Corp. v. TerryWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Cook v. EddyWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Christopher Hulme v. Catherine K. O'HareWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Vargas Ltd. Partnership v. Four "H" Ranches Architectural Control CommitteeWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API