Powder River Ranch, Inc. v. Michelena
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶ 1] Powder River Ranch, Inc. (PRR) appeals from the district court's order granting Juaguin and Delores Michelena (Mi-chelenas) a prescriptive easement across its property. We agree with the district court's conclusion that the Michelenas fulfilled the difficult requirements for establishing a prescriptive easement in Wyoming, and, consequently, we affirm its decision.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] PRR articulates its issue on appeal as follows:
A. Did the district court err in finding a prescriptive easement in favor of the plaintiff?
1. Did the court err in finding sufficient proof of adverse…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harber v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. DexterWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Double Eagle Petroleum & Mining Corporation v. Questar Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Gillette v. Hladky Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Yeager v. ForbesWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Whitney Holding Corp. v. TerryWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Cook v. EddyWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Christopher Hulme v. Catherine K. O'HareWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Vargas Ltd. Partnership v. Four "H" Ranches Architectural Control CommitteeWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.