Legal Opinion

Monterroso v. Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 28, 2008No. 06 Civ. 3404 (SAS)PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Cynthia Monterroso, proceeding pro se, brings suit against Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP (“S & C” or the “Firm”) under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 1 (the “ADA”) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 2 (“Title VII”). Plaintiff alleges that S & C discriminated against her on the following grounds: failure to accommodate her disability; unequal terms and conditions of employment; retaliation; and hostile work environment. S & C now moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c),…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Risco v. McHughDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Sosa v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ. & Marcy BergerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
  3. Gomez v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Costello v. NEW YORK STATE NURSES ASS'NDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. Smith v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API