Tajuddin v. Sandhu Petroleum Corp. Number 3
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Syed Tajuddin purchased property owned by Sandhu Petrolenm Corporation Number 3 at a tax sale. He petitioned for a tax deed, and Sandhu objected. The trial court denied Tajuddin's petition, finding he did not give proper notice to San-dhu and Sandhu was entitled to equitable relief. The court's conclusions regarding notice are not supported by the evidence, but Sandhu is entitled to equitable relief. Therefore, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Navdeep Singh and her husband own Sandhu. In 1996, Sandhu began purchas ing a gas station on contract from the William J.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Swami, Inc. v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Supervised Estate of Allender v. AllenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Atkins v. NiermeierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by9 opinions
- Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. of Grant & Blackford Counties v. M Jewell, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re 2007 Tax Sale in Lake CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re the 2014 Johnson Co. Tax Sale, Town of Edinburgh v. Patrick Black, Johnson Co. Auditor, and Johnson Co. TreasurerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Hullett v. LaFevreIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Lamasco Redevelopment, LLC v. Henry County, Indiana, Auditor and Henry County, Indiana, TreasurerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.