Legal Opinion

McLeod v. Morrison & Eshelman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1912No. 9719PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered November 15, 1910, in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for specific performance, after a trial on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

Appeal from a judgment decreeing specific performance of a contract for sale and conveyance of real estate.

On February 14, 1903, respondents’ intestate, who lived at Toppenish, Washington, entered into a written contract with one William E. Smith for the purchase of certain lots, in Aldine Heights addition to West Seattle, for an agreed price of $1,025. The contract acknowledged payment of $300 on its delivery, and provided that $375 should be paid on July 1, 1903, and $350 on January 1, 1904. An endorsement on the contract shows payment of the first of these deferred payments on July 3,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Abb v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Carstens v. McReavyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Heyn v. O'HagenMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Triggs v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Monro v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Wallowa National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Lemcke v. Funk & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Starr v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  4. First National Bank v. HenryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Johnson v. Wilbur-Ellis Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API