Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Wilbur-Ellis Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1925No. 19251. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action was brought to recover from the Alaska By-Products Company as maker, and the Wilbur-Ellis Company as endorser, the balance due on a promissory note. The Alaska By-Products Company defaulted. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact and conclusions of law sustaining the right to recover against the Wilbur-Ellis Company in the sum of $2,310, and interest and attorneys ’ fees. Prom the judgment entered, the Wilbur-Ellis Company appeals.

The appellant is a corporation organized under the laws of California, with its principal place of business at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Peterson v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. McLeod v. Morrison & EshelmanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Lindeman Lumber Co. v. Remolite Paint Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Baker v. Seattle & Puget Sound Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Colfax Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Sargent v. Drew-English, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lucci v. LucciWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Phillips v. Colfax Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API