Legal Opinion

People v. Davidovich

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 2000No. Docket 211144PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, P.J.

The prosecution appeals the trial court’s order allowing defendant, a resident alien, to withdraw his guilty plea after he learned that his conviction made him subject to deportation under federal immigration laws. Because the immigration consequences of a guilty plea are collateral, we find that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing defendant to withdraw his plea.

I

After being charged with possession with intent to deliver marijuana, MCL 333.7401(2)(d)(iii); MSA 14.15(7401)(2)(d)(iii), defendant pleaded guilty, and the trial court sentenced him to probation for one year. A few…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. People v. PozoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Tafoya v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. ChungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. FonvilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. DavidovichMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. KabreCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010
  4. State v. RamirezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. People v. BoatmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API