Legal Opinion

People v. Boatman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 2007No. Docket 270564PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

This matter is on remand from the Michigan Supreme Court for consideration, as on leave granted, “of whether defendant’s plea was understanding when defendant was not informed of the maximum possible sentence as an habitual offender.” People v Boatman, 475 Mich 862 (2006). Defendant appeals the order denying his request to withdraw his 1999 guilty plea to a charge of resisting and obstructing a police officer, MCL 750.479(l)(b). Defendant was sentenced as a fourth-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.12, to a prison term of 3 to 15 years. When a motion to withdraw a plea is made following…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Guilty Plea CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Grievance Administrator v. UnderwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. JahnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. ThewMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. FonvilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. KADEMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Purcell v. STURGIS HOSPITALMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API