Legal Opinion

United States v. Bolden

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 30, 1989No. 57,430; ACM 25518PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

In February 1986, Technical Sergeant Bolden was tried by a general court-martial with officer members at Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of several drug offenses; 1 2larceny of more than $100.00; and conspiracy to commit larceny of more than $100.00, in violation of Articles 112a, 121, and 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice, *12810 USC §§ 912a, 921, and 881, respectively. The court-martial adjudged a sentence of dishonorable discharge, confinement for 7 years, total forfeitures, a fine of $5,000.00, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. BoldenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  2. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  3. United States v. ElzahabiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. BridgesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  5. United States v. MinayaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API