Legal Opinion

Chinnock v. Paterson, P. & S. Tel. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 2, 1902PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

This bill, which was filed November 22, 1899, charged the defendant with infringement of letters patent of the United States No. 274,562, dated March 27, 1883, for an improvement in suspending cables or conductors. The bill alleged that the complainant was the original and first inventor of a new and useful improvement in suspending cables or conductors not known or used by others in this country, and not patented or described in any publication in this or any foreign country before his invention thereof, and not in public use or on sale for more than two years prior to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Beedle v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. New York Belting & Packing Co. v. New Jersey Car Spring & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Beer v. WalbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
  5. Ross v. City of Ft. WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Friend v. Burnham & Morrill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
  2. Krell Auto Grand Piano Co. v. Story & Clark Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  3. Lange v. McGuinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1910
  4. Luten v. Kansas City Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  5. United States Mitis Co. v. Midvale Steel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API