Legal Opinion

Branham v. Carter Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 1922No. 12991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.

Fred W. Branham, petitioner, commenced this action against the Carter Oil Company. Own Risk, and the State Industrial Commission, respondents, to reverse an award made on the 22nd day of December, 1921, denying to the petitioner compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law for an alleged permanent injury suffered by the petitioner as a result of an accident which happened on January 24, 1921, while the petitioner was working as an employe of the Carter Oil Company.

The petitioner, as gfounds for a reversal' of the award of the Industrial Commission, contends that the award is contrary to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Henly v. Oklahoma Union R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. McAlester Colliery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ybaibarriaga v. FarmerIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Lucky-Kidd Mining Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Tulsa Street Railway Co. v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Fitzsimmons v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Huddleston v. Commonwealth Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API