Legal Opinion

In re Stiller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by Peter N. Drosos from an order of the County Court of Broome county, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 27th day of April, 1916, denying his motion to dismiss a complaint in a proceeding under the provisions of section 33 of the Liquor Tax Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 34 [Laws of 1909, chap. 39], as amd. by Laws of 1913, chap. 614).*

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

Elias Stiller, a special agent of the Excise Department, made a complaint under the provisions of section 33 of the Liquor Tax Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 34 [Laws of 1909, chap. 39], as amd. by Laws of 1913, chap. 614),* alleging on information and belief that one John Drosos keeps, stores and has deposited liquors upon said premises located on Washington avenue, known as Endicott Candy Kitchen, in Endicott, B. Y., for the purpose of unlawful sale and distribution within this State, and that the sources of such information and the grounds of such belief are the *213observations of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muslusky v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Farley v. . One Hundred and Eighty Bottles of LiquorNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Braman v. BramanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Montgomery v. East Ridgelawn CemeteryNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. Smith v. First National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Capuano v. ZollaNew York Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API