Brache v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.
Juan Brache sought collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 from a jury conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) for using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug-trafficking crime. Brache claimed that the jury instruction as to “use” of a firearm under section 924(e)(1) was overbroad — measured by the definition later adopted by Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 143-46, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). Although the government admits that the instruction was not correct, it argues (and the district court agreed) that relief was not warranted. We…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sustache-Rivera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Simpson v. MatesanzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. SotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- UNITED STATES v. RAFAEL PAGÁN-SANTINICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Santoro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.