Legal Opinion

Santoro v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 9, 1999No. 98-2007, 98-2016PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Anthony Santoro and Jose Ordonez have each appealed the denial of his respective motion filed in the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Badamo v. United States, 17 F.Supp.2d 60 (D.R.I.1998). The district court granted a certificate of appealability (COA) to each petitioner as to the issue “whether there was sufficient evidence in the record to sustain petitioner’s plea to aiding and abetting in the use or carrying of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense; more specifically, whether the petitioner facilitated the use and/or carrying of a firearm.” After…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haugh v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. IsaacsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Badamo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Barrios v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  5. Granger v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API