Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1939No. 12696PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

There is a motion to dismiss the writ of error. To a suit wherein the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company was plaintiff, and the Federal Land Bank of Columbia et al. were defendants, a verdict was rendered and a decree entered thereon. Without filing, a motion-for new trial or a brief of the evidence, the bank’s counsel insists that the recitals in the bill .of exceptions and the record make applicable the provisions • of the Code, § 6-804. That section reads as follows: “In any case where *139the judgment, decree, or verdict necessarily has been controlled by one or more…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Callaway, McCarty & GregorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Pepper v. PepperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Cable Co. v. ParanthaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nail v. NailSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Thompson v. DoveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  3. Childs v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  4. Bender v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Harbour v. RittenbaumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API