Federal Land Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
There is a motion to dismiss the writ of error. To a suit wherein the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company was plaintiff, and the Federal Land Bank of Columbia et al. were defendants, a verdict was rendered and a decree entered thereon. Without filing, a motion-for new trial or a brief of the evidence, the bank’s counsel insists that the recitals in the bill .of exceptions and the record make applicable the provisions • of the Code, § 6-804. That section reads as follows: “In any case where *139the judgment, decree, or verdict necessarily has been controlled by one or more…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Callaway, McCarty & GregorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Pepper v. PepperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Cable Co. v. ParanthaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nail v. NailSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Thompson v. DoveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Childs v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Bender v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Harbour v. RittenbaumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.