Legal Opinion

Pepper v. Pepper

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1930No. 7359PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

The court did not err in overruling the general and the special grounds of the motion for new trial.

The defendant assigns error on the court’s refusal to take the case off the' trial calendar, on his motion in writing. The writing of the substance thereof is not set forth in this ground of the motion for hew trial.' Such written motion does appear in the record in the case but the same is not made a part of this ground by appropriate reference. A motion for new trial must be complete in itself. Any evidence material to a consideration of a ground of á motion for new trial must be embodied in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Doe ex dem. Truluck v. PeeplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  3. Carnes v. CarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  5. Myrick v. MyrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Dye v. DotsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Dowdell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. City of LaGrange v. PoundsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API