Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Dove

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 10, 1958No. 19942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The final judgment based upon the verdict of a jury is excepted to without any motion for a new trial having been filed, and the assignment of error thereon is that it is erroneous and contrary to law. This is insufficient to bring the judgment under general review by this court. Jennings v. Jennings, 169 Ga. 377 (150 S. E. 552); Vick v. Farmers &c. Bank of Coolidge, 209 Ga. 77 (70 S. E. 2d 764). But such assignment of error is sufficient to require a review of the judgment in so far as it resulted from an antecedent ruling on which error is also assigned. Code §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Vick v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of CoolidgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Nail v. NailSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beeland v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Ormewood Apartments, Inc. v. McDonough Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API