Legal Opinion

Dyson Technology Ltd. v. Maytag Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 6, 2007No. Civil Action No. 05-434(GMS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SLEET, District Judge.

1. On February 2, 2007, the court held a discovery teleconference in the above-captioned action. One of the issues raised by Maytag Corporation (“Maytag”) was the discoverability of work-product and attorney-client privilege information that Dyson Technology Limited and Dyson, Inc. (“Dyson”) provided to its experts, specifically James Widdowson (“Widdowson”), an employee of Dyson Limited (an indirect parent of Dyson, Inc.). After hearing argument, the court ordered the parties to submit letter briefing on the issue, which it would treat as Maytag’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re: Cendant Corporation Securities Litigation Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  2. Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Synthes Spine Co., L.P. v. WaldenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. CP Kelco U.S. Inc. v. Pharmacia Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
  5. Super Film of America, Inc. v. UCB Films, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. Dow Argo SciencesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Railway Express, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  3. Teleglobe USA, Inc. v. BCE Inc. (In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008
  4. Packer v. SN Servicing Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  5. Greenhaw v. City of Cedar RapidsDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API