Legal Opinion
CP Kelco U.S. Inc. v. Pharmacia Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 11, 2003No. CIV.A.01-240-KAJPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JORDAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is the objection (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 234) of plaintiff, CP Kelco US, Inc. (“CP Kelco”), to the Magistrate Judge’s ruling of October 29, 2002 (D.I. 224) that Pharmacia Corporation (“Pharmacia”) need not produce documents that it had provided to an expert witness. Because the Magistrate Judge’s ruling was based on an erroneous application of the law,1 the objection of CP Kelco is sustained, the October 29, 2002 Order of the Magistrate Judge is vacated, and the documents at issue must be produced.
The factual circumstances behind the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. KrasnovDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Masimo Corp. v. Philips Electronic North America Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- Synthes Spine Co., L.P. v. WaldenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Green v. NygaardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- In Re Detention of WestWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Dyson Technology Ltd. v. Maytag Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.