Legal Opinion
Otis J. Holloman v. Mail-Well Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 27, 2006No. 05-10850PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Otis J. Holloman and Jonella Holloman appeal from the district court’s order of final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee Mail-Well Corp. (“Mail-Well”) on their claims brought under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1101-1114. After thorough review, we conclude that the district court correctly granted final summary judgment on the Hollomans’ claims. Moreover, we are unpersuaded by appellants’ claim that the district court abused its discretion when it denied their motions to compel discovery. Finally, we lack…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Luis Virgilio v. Terrabrook Vista Lakes, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Swisher International, Inc. v. SchaferCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Mitchell J. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Thomas v. George, Hartz, Lundeen, Fulmer, Johnstone, King, & Stevens, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- J.J. Rissell, Allentown PA, Trust v. Spiro MarchelosCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.