Legal Opinion
Thomas v. George, Hartz, Lundeen, Fulmer, Johnstone, King, & Stevens, P.A.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 24, 2008No. 06-16158PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Circuit Judge:
Colin Thomas (“Thomas”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment against his claim that attorney Charles Michael Hartz and the law firm, George, Hartz, Lundeen, Fulmer, John-stone, King and Stevens, P.A. (collectively, “Hartz”) violated the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (“DPPA”) by wrongfully obtaining and using personal information contained in driver’s license records. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
On March 28, 2002, Hartz purchased from the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles the registration information of all individuals in Miami-Dade…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Pichler v. UNITECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Jason Senne v. Village of Palatine, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Taylor v. Acxiom Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Watts v. City of HollywoodDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Jaime Pizarro v. The Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.