Legal Opinion
Spier v. Erber
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 18, 1991No. 89 Civ. 1657 (PKL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
LEISURE, District Judge:
This is an action for damages arising out of an alleged fraudulent scheme to sell interests in a limited’ partnership. Plaintiffs allege that defendants have violated section 29(b) and section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78cc(b) and 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. Plaintiffs also seek recovery under the doctrines of common law fraud, accountant malpractice and attorney malpractice.
Defendant Waste Technology Corporation (“Waste Tech”) 1 has answered the complaint and filed cross-claims…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farrell Lines Inc. v. Columbus Cello-Poly Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- P.A. Bergner & Co. v. MartinezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. Losco Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn. v. LOSCO GROUPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Argonaut Insurance Company a/s/o Heritage II, LLC v. Big Interior Construction, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.