Legal Opinion
Farrell Lines Inc. v. Columbus Cello-Poly Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 15, 1997No. 96 Civ. 5250(MBM)PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Farrell Lines Inc. sues Columbus Cello-Poly Corp. (“Columbus”), Cigna Insurance Co. of Europe S.A.-N.V. (“Cigna”), UTECO S.p.A. (“UTECO”), UMS Generali Marine S.p.A. (“UMS”), Reunion Francaise S.A. (“Reunion”), La Fondiaria Assicurazioni S.p.A. (“La Fondiaria”), and Ceres Terminals Inc. (“Ceres”) for a judgment declaring that: 1) the forum selection clause in the bill of lading governing the cargo at issue which requires suit in this district is enforceable; 2) plaintiffs liability to defendants for damage to cargo transported on one of plaintiffs…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Dow Jones & Co., Inc. v. Harrods, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Reliance Insurance v. Six Star, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi NegaraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- GMAC Commercial Credit, LLC v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Farrell Lines Inc. v. Ceres Terminals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.