Legal Opinion
Arndt v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 17, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-6633PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
PRATTER, District Judge.
Shawn Arndt brought suit against the manufacturers of Infants’ Tylenol following his 4-year-old son’s tragic death after *676ingesting one dose of the medication. The Defendants moved to dismiss his Complaint, and following oral argument on that motion, Mr. Arndt filed an Amended Complaint. The Defendants have now moved to dismiss all but one claim in the Amended Complaint, arguing that the statute of limitations bars all but Mr. Arndt’s implied warranty claim. After considering the parties’ briefing and hearing oral argument on November 24, 2014, the Court will…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Mayer v. BelichickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Aston v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Doe v. Post Acute Medical, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- ROBINSON v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Siqueiros v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.