Legal Opinion
ROBINSON v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 16, 2021No. 2:21-cv-04050Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARYANN AND DONALD ROBINSON : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 21-4050 : SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA : TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al. : MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, J. November 16, 2021 Lawyers bringing claims on injured parties’ behalf must be ever mindful of a state’s public policy limiting the amount of time to sue allegedly responsible parties for negligence. Lawyers routinely investigate responsible parties before filing suit. Sometimes they face complications like an undisclosed management of a property where the injury…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Edward Arthur v. Maersk, Inc. D/B/A Maersk Line Ltd. Dyn Corp. Technical Services D/B/A Dyn Marine Services the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.