Gilmore Steel Corp., Or. Steel Mills Div. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
This action is before the Court on the motion of intervenor, Pohang Iron & Steel Co. (POSCO), to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction due to insufficient service of process and for lack of standing on the part of plaintiff, Gilmore Steel Corporation (Gilmore). The defendant, United States, joins Gilmore in opposing the motion.
Background
Plaintiff commenced this action on May 14, 1986 to contest revocation of an anti-dumping order on carbon steel plate from Korea. It filed a summons with the clerk of the court within 30 days of publication of notice of the revocation, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shihshu Walter Wei v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Yancheng Baolong Biochemical Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Magnesium Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998