Mulcahy v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Justice.
The central issue here is whether we will depart from our rule of causation that a plaintiff in a products liability action bears the burden of proving the defendant manufactured or supplied the product that caused the injury. Plaintiffs maintain they are injured due to the ingestion in 1949 of a drug, a synthetic estrogen compound of stilbene derivatives which we shall refer to as DES. Plaintiffs are not able to specifically identify the manufacturer of the drug ingested. Consequently, they commenced this action against a group of drug companies who allegedly manufactured…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Gaulding v. Celotex Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- City of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.