Legal Opinion

State v. Pulley

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 26, 1997No. AC 14644PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

O’CONNELL, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123 (a) (2). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion for judgment of acquittal, (2) instructed the jury on larceny in the second degree, and (3) admitted testimony relating to the defendant’s arrest for breach of peace. In addition, the defendant claims that he is entitled to a new trial because he was prejudiced by a defective charging document. We affirm the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. State v. VarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. State v. KimberConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. White v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. ParnoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  5. State v. GreeneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API