Legal Opinion
State v. Kimber
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 24, 1998No. AC 15800PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant, Boise Kimber, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-1241 and perjury in violation of Gen*236eral Statutes § 53a-156 (a).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion for judgment of acquittal of the larceny and perjury charges, (2) deprived him of his right to due process by failing to require the state to provide notice of the allegedly false statements used as the basis of the perjury charge and (3) violated his right…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Masse v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Fernwood Realty, LLC v. Aerocision, LLC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. ToroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Yeomans v. WallaceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.